🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a growing number of states are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy may be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," stated one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the state level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from the West, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global organizations adopt a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments globally are no longer willing to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.