🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are paid to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how little it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.